39

Why Are There So Many 9/11 Conspiracies?



Please Subscribe! http://testu.be/1FjtHn5 September 11th, 2001 was documented extensively, in real time, around the world. So why are there are still …

source

admini22

39 Comments

  1. 9/11 governments theory is bullshit it's the dumbest conspiracy of them all. The building weren't taken down in that fashion by a couple planes. If anyone thinks this they need a cognitive dissonance shrink. It was an inside job there was no real investigation. What the government said isn't possible. Don't know what this guy is rambling on about but 9/11 was done by people within our own government. Buildings were blown up and fell at free fall. It's moronic to think they fell by jet fuel.

  2. what was Lucky Larry's plan to get rid of the $3 billion worth of asbestos in there? Is he really that dumb to take on such a liability without even owning it??

  3. there was fire around bldg 7??? man u cant say thats not suspicious as hell that the bldg went down its whatever some people believe all conspiracy and some dont believe in non…i was hoping he will go into it like he did with flat earth which was good

  4. Sorry, but i have been through the 9/11 commission report and what it states that happens is not what you see on all the available videos.
    9/11 was implemented by the American government. There are numerous signs that tell you it was a controlled demolition if you look into it.

  5. Regardless of what anyone chooses to believe, it is a FACT that, a conspiracy was executed.

    con·spir·a·cy (kənˈspirəsē) noun
    1. a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.

    Listening to him and how he delivers the information shows that he has NOT investigated the subject matter. Please use your words properly.

  6. Here is a formula that you can use to test yourself:

    t = sqrt( 2h / g )

    this formula does not factor in the normal force which would have been present.

    You literally have to ignore the normal force of the building in order to account for the motion of freefall. Thus proving that external energy had to be introduced into the system in order for freefall to occur. (basic highschool physics) Not to mention that Mr. Larry Silverstein physically stated that "they made the decision to pull it." meaning to demolish building 7. This contradicts what NIST and the official 9/11 commission report says.

    The NIST report and the official 9/11 report dont even agree on how the buildings collapsed.

  7. People will never believe their government would do such thing because its YOUR country. It goes against your interest. But if the government says that another country has WMDs when they really dont, you will vote to invade that country without thinking twice about it.

    So even if the government told you right in your face that they did 9-11, you would still not believe it!

  8. Can someone please intelligently explain to me how building 7 comes down at free fall speed? Building 7 did catch on fire but it wasn't directly hit by any jet airplanes. The fuel for the fire that burned through several floors was just office furniture and only one single structural beam was damaged. The official 911 report states that the building came down as a result of fire yet history has shown that no steel structure building has ever collapsed as a result of fire.

  9. Search the seven part YouTube series made by Myles Power about the 9/11 conspiracy.

    He goes in great detail and has (probably) the best explanation as to why the terrorist attacks are not an inside job and even has a segment as to why people believe this illogical conspiracy.

  10. 'Confirmation Bias' … Yes indeed. Lol … There is widespread confirmation bias in a society that is burdened by 24/7 corporatist propaganda, and cradle to grave statist indoctrination.
    It is no sign of a sane and sound mind to be well adjusted to a pathological society.
    \][//

  11. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
    Jones – Harrit, et al
    Abstract:
    "We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the
    destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in
    this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan
    resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later.

    The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy
    dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 ˚C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic."
    https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf
    . . . . . . . . . . .
    This paper has never been successfully rebutted in the 9 years since it's publication.
    \][//

  12. Because we know that the "official story" is bull shit.
    Because we can look back on that day and say, hmmmm, a lot of what they said doesn't make a whole lot of sense…. why is that….

  13. There is too many things the government covered up youll never get all the facts. And consperisys happen because this government lies. I could go toe to tow with you on this steel… the main beams holding the build. There were bombs in all 3 building.

  14. You have so many facts on the d channel but this kind of bit hard. Where are your facts in this channel. I watch your stuff for proofs. Education ect. You left me hanging here. I feel that some science behind this could have finally smoothed things out. I get this was on why we have conspiracies. And yup you cover that. Why we want to have conspiracies. Yup you got that one too. But you are such a smart person why did you go so blah on this one. I love your channels have subscribed to most but this one is left kind of blank. Give me science, give me the knowledge that we come to these channels for. Not saying I agree or disagree with 9/11 conspiracy. But saying I want you to do some research and share your findings. Keep the trust you have earned so far. Help us understand how, why, where. People that listen to you are into quantum physics, quantum mechanics, ect. Why would you leave all science from this?

  15. Im not positive about how 911 occurred. I consider my self to be an above average analytical and skeptical thinker. There are certain facts or occurrences that are backed by actual science, (nutshell : melting point of steel, Flashpoint of various jet fuels and max burn Temps) I guess I tend to fall in the conspiracy theory trap in this case since people have not been able to answer certain questions about structural failures, past history of high rise fires, when put up against scientific facts that have already been established throughout the scientific community. I guess I'm just craving an unbiased science based emotionless conversation on the topic.

Leave a Reply to lenny Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *