32

Debunking Lunar Landing Conspiracies with Maxwell and VXGI



Explore the truth behind the iconic Buzz Aldrin moon landing photo. See how modern graphics innovations can shed new light on a 45-year-old conspiracy …

source

admini22

32 Comments

  1. It's not that the landings were faked, it's that they mixed in photos (probably by mistake) that were taken in a studio. Even Hasselblat, the company that made the camera, acknowledged problems with the photos.

  2. What a load of BS!!!
    Oh yes!!! A lot of 'research', 'modelling' and other Cl___trap to make it sound 'scientific'.
    This 'moon lander' doesn't make sense.
    Anyone with an inkling of physics knows that to maximize volume and minimize surface area you need a sphere or as close as possible.
    This will reduce your weight and allow you to increase your payload.
    This crappy thing NASA calls a 'Moon Lander' looks like something a primary school student has put together glued, screwed and nailed out of leftover from cardboard and discarded toys.
    A classic case 'if you cannot dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with BS'.
    This thing wouldn't get off the ground in a pink fit.
    NASA didn't go to the moon and still cannot go to the moon.
    There is an obstacle, it's called radiation.
    There is no tangible evidence that they sent men to the moon and back.
    Even a cursory inspection of any of the photos and videos will tell you, IT IS ALL FAKED!!!
    Who are all these NASA propagandists?
    They are hell bent in defending the undefendable, support the unsupportable, fight for the unwinnable.
    Do they have no integrity? Will they say anything as long as they are paid enough money???

  3. If you put the photos taken on the Moon in a picture editor and turn down the brightness you can clearly see many of them are taken with spotlights on the subject, this tells us they were not taken on the Moon.
    Also if you look at some of the other original photos you can even see that the Earth is literally pasted on in the sky- they are gradually cleaning up all the photos to hide the fakery.
    Anybody who looks for themselves quickly sees how absolutely absurd the Moon landings were, but most people can't do or even think for themselves, they believe unquestioningly the high priests of science just as they always have.

  4. The fake moon landing nonsense is just silly….and it's practical purpose, the reason NASA & the CIA implemented this misinformation to begin with anyway….is to be YET AGAIN, another distraction from WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON!….and the true nature of the moon & of…..well….Everything lol! So WAKE UP…..lol or go to sleep….all the exact same to me
    <))°•o:•••–¡{°O°}¡–•••:o•°((>

  5. I see that a common topic about the moon landing hoax is the van allen belts, well, they did still substain injury’s from the van Allen belts.

  6. As someone with photography experience, the Hasslblad camera they used shot photos on the moon at F-stops of F-16-22 or smaller because of the high reflectance of the moon surface. you can't photograph stars even on Earth at F22 unless your exposure's are over a minute long! on film. remember there was no digital cameras back then.

  7. utterly unconvincing…but why even bother with shadows and models? why not just take the word of the members of Pres Nixon's staff who admitted it was staged?

  8. TV history in the making, thanks for amazing inspiration. Next destination Mars.
    "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind." Neil Armstrong's famous quote/oneliner. The United States' Apollo 11 was the spaceflight that landed the first two humans on the Moon in 1969.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars
    Elon Musk Gives Updates on Mission to Mars.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcVpMJp9Th4
    Elon Musk: Falcon Heavy Launch And Spaceman Secrets Decoded
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8sQnyHt5YY

  9. Ha ha ha. Good try. But the Truth is out now. This is a sad, desperate attempt by government agents to cover up the Truth. This moon landing scam is beyond a joke. Media lies, governor lies. THE MOON LANDING IS A HOAX.

  10. I also do believe man did not land on the Moon only due to overwhelming evidence. When I saw the photos when I was 8 I was very surprised that there were no stars in the photos. However If you google the NASA photos of the space shuttle's mission there are no stars in those photos either. The new cameras are very sensitive and are HD. They did not take any photos for conspiracy reasons so that proves that even best modern cameras cannot capture stars today let alone in 60s.

  11. 1986 Challenger explosion hoax those people never died, moon landing hoax, you can never pass the dome firmament earth is flat. space x Falcon 9 explosion just to by time to entertain these sheeps a hoax, Tesla car in space stupidest idea ever hoax!! wow can’t wait for the fake mars mission and you wonder why they keep pushing the dates back? Damn Satan working everyday 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️wake up!!

  12. HELLO BOYS AND GIRLS,TODAY WE ARE GOING TO WATCH ASTRONOTS ON THE LUNAR SUFACE,HITTING GOLF BALLS.LET'S LISTEN IN.
    HEY ALAN SHEPPARD,INSTEAD OF BEING FILMED HITTING GOLF BALLS ON THE LUNAR SURFACE.WOULDN'T IT BE SPECTACULAR ,IF THE CAMERA FILMING YOU,WOULD JUST TURN AROUND AND
    FILM THE WHOLE EARTH SPINNING IN BLACK SPACE, I'M SURE THE FOLKS BACK HOME WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT…….AHHHHHH, NO I'D RATHER BE HITTING GOLF BALLS.
    WAKE UP AND GET YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASS.THE TRUTH IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU BUT YOU CAN'T SEE IT,BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN PROGRAMMED AND INDOCTRINATED,TO BELIEVE
    WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN TAUGHT AND TOLD SINCE CHILDHOOD AND THROUGHOUT THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM, AND FROM YOUR GOD NASA.

    NEXT EPISODE : NEIL ARMSTRONGS CAMERAMAN ON THE MOON……STAY TUNED BOYS AND GIRLS,YOU WON'T WANT TO MISS THIS ONE.

  13. just because you matched the lighting in the photo does not mean it was taken on the moon. You simply replicated the photo. but not quite accurately enough. Your astronaut is brighter than the astronaut in the original photo.

  14. Wow theses guys are REACHING! The picture still didn't look right after all that work to simulate global exposure… they the find the undeniable second light source. But then cognitive dissonance takes over and now its his suit that acted like a mirror that reflected back to his own body.. Really?

  15. You didn't even bother to touch the psyche analysis disproving that the specific Astronauts said to have gone to the moon did not go to the moon. Even if you could find human stuff on the moon, it is not the Astronauts such as Aldrin and Armstrong who put it up there.

    All of that bit seems irrelevant to you. Why is that? Do you think psychology is not an actual science?

  16. We went to the moon but I don’t get why nasa says we actually lost the technology to go back wtf! That makes no sense. Or obama saying we are working on getting man out passed the van Allen belt that’s way closer then the moon.

  17. People not wanting to purchase a NVIDIA product again because of this video like NVIDIA just offended their cat lmao. Just shows the level of immaturity they have, wouldnt take them seriously.

  18. Here is the scientific explanation of no stars in the photographs.
    Stars are clearly visible in space. Actually, we can see them better from space than through our thick atmosphere. That’s why we keep sending telescopes there.

    The reason they are not visible in photos has a lot more to do with photography than with astronomy.

    Stars are very dim and the light reflected by the Earth and the Moon is just so much brighter. To take good pictures in space you need to have a high shutter speed and a very short exposure, which means our planet and satellite are clearly visible but the stars often can't be seen.

    On top of the unusual light conditions in space, there’s another factor, which requires rapid reaction times from the camera. The ISS moves at 8 kilometers per second (17,150 mph) which is great for staying in orbit but less so for not-shaky images.

    The problem is not just an exclusive issue in space, either. Try and take a photo of the night sky on your mobile phone. How many stars do you see? And what happens if you try to take a picture of something in the foreground, do you still see the stars behind?

    There’s a reason why astrophotographers use highly expensive equipment that is optimized for the specific task and plan carefully around the hour, weather conditions, and exposure time.

    And even if the stars are often not visible in all photos, videos, and live streams, there are plenty of beautifully shot images showing the stars, and even the Milky Way, photographed from the ISS that are available to stare at to your heart's content.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *